Obama did not rule out a limited military action against Syria

by **Ponee** Thu Aug 29, 2013 2:00 pm

U.S. President Barack Obama, in an interview with Radio service American public that the United States concluded that the Syrian government has carried out attacks with chemical weapons near Damascus, did not rule out Obama’s military action is limited to a deterrent against the use of chemical weapons in the future, but he said he did not take decision after directing a military strike against the Syrian regime.

At a time in which it provided Britain’s proposal of the five permanent members of the Security Council of the United Nations be allowed to take all necessary measures to protect Syrian civilians, the Secretary-General of the United Nations Ban Ki-moon that he will receive next Saturday the report of inspectors of chemical weapons who are investigating the alleged use of this type of weapons in Syria. denies the Syrian government strongly use of chemical weapons, accusing militants opposition responsibility for the attack, which took place last week in Ghouta Damascus.

At this point, called the National Coalition Syrian opposition Thursday Western countries to a military strike against the Syrian regime . The President of the Coalition Ahmad Jarba in an interview with the French newspaper Le Parisien hoped to support the Free Syrian Army and a military strike against the Syrian regime. Abdul Basit Sida (photo) leader of the opposition Syrian National Coalition

Told Radio Free Iraq that “the right of the Syrian people to have the protection of the international community and military intervention is required in order to save Syrians from the Syrian regime.” Amid contrast attitudes Arab and Western countries on punishing Syria to use chemical weapons, I spoke to press reports, the diversity of military options before the leaders American politicians and the British, the strike is limited to targets in Syria, or military intervention Barre.
likely Jeff Mac Kausland retired U.S. general and analyst military affairs, the first option, he said in an analysis of the satellite free “The objectives of the strike will be basically the command and control centers, and possibly the headquarters of devices intelligence. There may be an attempt to neutralize the Air Force Syrian, who is on the transfer of munitions, chemical Among the main objectives of the strike will be large units of the army that launched these attacks, if you have been identified. all of those could be potential targets for blow. ”

But Dr. Abbas Kazim, a professor oldest in the Institute of Studies of Iraq, at Boston University, believes that the United States, “trying to escalate the rhetoric,” in order to pave the way for some kind of a diplomatic solution, especially after the problems encountered when attacking Iraq, and that the prevailing view in Washington is prudence and not urgency for a military strike against Syria, what could be the strike of dire consequences for the region flaming originally opinion Abbas Kadhim.

warned observers and political analysts from the repercussions of a strike to Syria, as happened in Iraq, Mqll its effectiveness in resolving the bloody conflict going on in the country for more than two years.
and political analyst Russian Constantine Troyvtsev Constantin Truevtsev, that a military strike potential if short will not affect the Syrian regime, but probably will change the balance of power if it is a long and violent as he put it. excludes Hamid Fadel, professor of political science at Baghdad University, to be possible military strike against Syria crucial to the ongoing conflict there between the Syrian regime forces and the armed opposition, expressing fear of the collapse of the Syrian regime will contribute to the complexity of the security situation in Iraq.

iraqhurr.org