If you can't say something nice, zip your lips.

GivingGodTheGlory wrote:Let's all remember to only speak words of support and edify one another on here. Let Jesus be Lord on this forum.

amstech wrote:Jesus called things as they were and exposed the lie as well at times. There is nothing ungodly about exposing and recognizing misinformation. Remember, it's not the hype that is going to get you there but the work of the Lord through to completion. All the continual hype does is drag you along through the briar patch roughly and carelessly. They think they are helping but in reality they are not....



Would Jesus continualy hype you up and feed you a bunch of bogus information that he didn't even actually understand and have any real knowledge about the inner workings of such. Guys, I have seen the hype effect many people and some of those peole are elderly and very very effected by it. They actually believed that the info providers knew what they were talking about and that the info was true more than once. It's not right to jack them around or anyone for that reason. If none of you have figured it out by now, Bulldog and Okie and their crew don't know jack because their sources are no good. I've been in this since 2004 and have more dinar than many of you combined and never ever have any of the info providers been right, especially Okie and his new spokesperson Bulldog and his "possitive talk" trying to disquise the fact that he knows nothing of real substance.

If you choose to follow closely then you deserve to be drug through the emotional briar patch. It would be much easier for the masses if they would just calm down and quit blurting the spastic hype.

Guys, what would Jesus do about the hype? Serously, what would he do about misinformation? Would he deliver it to you on a siver platter and say, Here, eat freely, I'm only the messenger"......

amstech wrote:Jesus called things as they were and exposed the lie as well at times. There is nothing ungodly about exposing and recognizing misinformation. Remember, it's not the hype that is going to get you there but the work of the Lord through to completion. All the continual hype does is drag you along through the briar patch roughly and carelessly. They think they are helping but in reality they are not....



Would Jesus continualy hype you up and feed you a bunch of bogus information that he didn't even actually understand and have any real knowledge about the inner workings of such. Guys, I have seen the hype effect many people and some of those peole are elderly and very very effected by it. They actually believed that the info providers knew what they were talking about and that the info was true more than once. It's not right to jack them around or anyone for that reason. If none of you have figured it out by now, Bulldog and Okie and their crew don't know jack because their sources are no good. I've been in this since 2004 and have more dinar than many of you combined and never ever have any of the info providers been right, especially Okie and his new spokesperson Bulldog and his "possitive talk" trying to disquise the fact that he knows nothing of real substance.

If you choose to follow closely then you deserve to be drug through the emotional briar patch. It would be much easier for the masses if they would just calm down and quit blurting the spastic hype.

Guys, what would Jesus do about the hype? Serously, what would he do about misinformation? Would he deliver it to you on a siver platter and say, Here, eat freely, I'm only the messenger"......

052676 wrote:Everybody should stop using Jesus as the scapegoat. Yes, Jesus was gentle and polite but he also showed anger and disagreed with others.

Does anyone not remember when Jesus criticized the Jews for trading
in the temple and said “Is it not written, My house shall be called
of all nations the house of prayer” (Mk. 11:17)

Does anyone not remember when Jesus righteously criticized
the Pharisees harshly because they put more stock upon the outside appearance of one’s body rather concentrating upon their inner hearts and desires.

There is nothing wrong with agreeing to disagree. It is not considered bashing nor impolite to disagree with what someone is saying.

aksafeone wrote:Disagreeing with someone or some thing is human nature. AS LONG as it is done respectfully and without malice.
Disrespect, hate, malcontent, maleficence, and over aggressive (attacking) types of approaches to disagreement ARE NOT ACCEPTABLE just about any where one chooses to look (at home, work or in public).
It basically is how one words the disagreeable comment that makes the difference between the statement being acceptable or not. In other words, the true meaning of the terminology used to express ones opinion or view when it is applied to a given situation.

officerjohnsmith wrote:Okie and Bulldog are the best...they are always days ahead of all the other intel givers and are always correct on their intel...just off on the date. Okie gets reports from the UST, Banks, Iraq and the White House...the BEST intel available anywhere.

openmind wrote:

officerjohnsmith wrote:Okie and Bulldog are the best...they are always days ahead of all the other intel givers and are always correct on their intel...just off on the date. Okie gets reports from the UST, Banks, Iraq and the White House...the BEST intel available anywhere.

Im not going to question Okie and Bulldog's personality because I don't know them, nor do I know anyone who does.

With regards to the rest of your statement, other than the date, what other intel has there been?

purpleskyz wrote:I think this site is getting tag teamed. Look at the IP's. Look at the sequence of posts.
I see you...R

purpleskyz wrote:I think this site is getting tag teamed. Look at the IP's. Look at the sequence of posts.
I see you...R