Latest topics
United US Senate adopts tough Iran sanctions
Page 1 of 1
United US Senate adopts tough Iran sanctions
e US Senate unanimously adopted harsh new economic sanctions on Iran,
dismissing US officials' fears they risked fracturing global unity on
blocking Tehran's suspected nuclear weapons program.
Lawmakers voted 100-0 to include the measure, which aims to cut off
Iran's central bank from the global financial system, in a must-pass
annual military spending bill poised for final approval.
Senators rebuffed an 11th-hour campaign from top aides to President Barack Obama
who warned the legislation could shatter a growing but fragile global
consensus on confronting the defiant Islamic republic over its nuclear
drive.
The measure, crafted by Democratic Senator Robert Menendez and Republican Senator Mark Kirk, calls for freezing the US-based assets of financial institutions that do business with the central bank.
It
would apply to non-US central banks that do so for the purpose of
buying or selling petroleum -- Iran's chief source of revenues -- or
related goods, amid growing fears that time is running short to solve
the standoff peacefully.
"This is the right amendment, at the
right time, sending the right message in the face of a very
irresponsible regime," Kirk said.
"This is the maximum opportunity to have a peaceful diplomacy tool to stop Iran's march to nuclear weapons," said Menendez.
US
officials have warned that depriving global markets of Iranian exports
could send oil prices sharply higher, handing Tehran a windfall at a
time when it has struggled to cope with painful international economic
sanctions.
To address that, Kirk and Menendez's measure says the
sanctions would only apply if Obama determines that there is sufficient
oil from other producers to avoid disrupting global markets, and enables
him to delay them if he determines that to be vital to US national
security interests.
And Kirk said this week that Saudi Arabia's ambassador had told him of the kingdom's "great willingness" to boost its output to meet any resulting shortfall in supply.
The sanctions would not apply to sales of food, medicine and medical devices.
Earlier,
Undersecretary of State for Political Affairs Wendy Sherman and
Treasury Undersecretary for Terrorism and Financial Intelligence David Cohen warned the plan risked alienating key allies and inadvertently lining Iran's pockets.
"We all agree with the impulse, the sentiment, the objective, which is to really go at the jugular of Iran's economy," Sherman said in a frequently contentious hearing of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee.
"But
there is absolutely a risk that, in fact, the price of oil would go up
which would mean that Iran would, in fact, have more money to fuel its
nuclear ambitions, not less," she said.
"Now, more than ever, it
is imperative that we act in a way that does not threaten to fracture
the international coalition of nations," Cohen said at a hearing just
hours before lawmakers were to vote on the plan.
Sherman and
Cohen's entreaties ran headlong into sharp criticisms from lawmakers
impatient with the pace and scope of pressure on Iran and worried time
was running short until the US nemesis joins the club of nuclear
nations.
"You haven't shown us the robust effort, when the clock
is ticking, to use that which we have given you," Menendez scolded,
referring to past sanctions laws.
"We hear the words, we hear the talk, but we've wanted action for some time and it just hasn't happened," said Republican Senator James Risch, who warned of an "urgency gap" between the White House and Congress.
Senator Richard Lugar, the committee's top Republican, scoffed at concerns that the measure could alienate China, saying "they're not taking this very seriously anyway."
And,
with the specter of military force as a last option lurking over the
debate, Lugar declared "we're going to have to either contend with
diplomacy with the Chinese or potential warfare with the Iranians."
Republican Senator Bob Corker asked whether Washington
was "making plans with our friends towards military action" and sending
"signals to Iran that, if these sanctions do not work, we really are
prepared to use that option."
"Iran understands, and they read the
newspapers and see what's happening. They understand it is a serious
possibility," replied Sherman.
The Senate and House of Representatives
were to hold negotiations to blend their rival versions of the
underlying bill and send the compromise to Obama to sign into law.
Source:
AFP American Edition
dismissing US officials' fears they risked fracturing global unity on
blocking Tehran's suspected nuclear weapons program.
Lawmakers voted 100-0 to include the measure, which aims to cut off
Iran's central bank from the global financial system, in a must-pass
annual military spending bill poised for final approval.
Senators rebuffed an 11th-hour campaign from top aides to President Barack Obama
who warned the legislation could shatter a growing but fragile global
consensus on confronting the defiant Islamic republic over its nuclear
drive.
The measure, crafted by Democratic Senator Robert Menendez and Republican Senator Mark Kirk, calls for freezing the US-based assets of financial institutions that do business with the central bank.
It
would apply to non-US central banks that do so for the purpose of
buying or selling petroleum -- Iran's chief source of revenues -- or
related goods, amid growing fears that time is running short to solve
the standoff peacefully.
"This is the right amendment, at the
right time, sending the right message in the face of a very
irresponsible regime," Kirk said.
"This is the maximum opportunity to have a peaceful diplomacy tool to stop Iran's march to nuclear weapons," said Menendez.
US
officials have warned that depriving global markets of Iranian exports
could send oil prices sharply higher, handing Tehran a windfall at a
time when it has struggled to cope with painful international economic
sanctions.
To address that, Kirk and Menendez's measure says the
sanctions would only apply if Obama determines that there is sufficient
oil from other producers to avoid disrupting global markets, and enables
him to delay them if he determines that to be vital to US national
security interests.
And Kirk said this week that Saudi Arabia's ambassador had told him of the kingdom's "great willingness" to boost its output to meet any resulting shortfall in supply.
The sanctions would not apply to sales of food, medicine and medical devices.
Earlier,
Undersecretary of State for Political Affairs Wendy Sherman and
Treasury Undersecretary for Terrorism and Financial Intelligence David Cohen warned the plan risked alienating key allies and inadvertently lining Iran's pockets.
"We all agree with the impulse, the sentiment, the objective, which is to really go at the jugular of Iran's economy," Sherman said in a frequently contentious hearing of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee.
"But
there is absolutely a risk that, in fact, the price of oil would go up
which would mean that Iran would, in fact, have more money to fuel its
nuclear ambitions, not less," she said.
"Now, more than ever, it
is imperative that we act in a way that does not threaten to fracture
the international coalition of nations," Cohen said at a hearing just
hours before lawmakers were to vote on the plan.
Sherman and
Cohen's entreaties ran headlong into sharp criticisms from lawmakers
impatient with the pace and scope of pressure on Iran and worried time
was running short until the US nemesis joins the club of nuclear
nations.
"You haven't shown us the robust effort, when the clock
is ticking, to use that which we have given you," Menendez scolded,
referring to past sanctions laws.
"We hear the words, we hear the talk, but we've wanted action for some time and it just hasn't happened," said Republican Senator James Risch, who warned of an "urgency gap" between the White House and Congress.
Senator Richard Lugar, the committee's top Republican, scoffed at concerns that the measure could alienate China, saying "they're not taking this very seriously anyway."
And,
with the specter of military force as a last option lurking over the
debate, Lugar declared "we're going to have to either contend with
diplomacy with the Chinese or potential warfare with the Iranians."
Republican Senator Bob Corker asked whether Washington
was "making plans with our friends towards military action" and sending
"signals to Iran that, if these sanctions do not work, we really are
prepared to use that option."
"Iran understands, and they read the
newspapers and see what's happening. They understand it is a serious
possibility," replied Sherman.
The Senate and House of Representatives
were to hold negotiations to blend their rival versions of the
underlying bill and send the compromise to Obama to sign into law.
Source:
AFP American Edition
Happy Life- VIP Member
- Posts : 514
Join date : 2011-11-16
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
Sat Sep 07, 2024 8:16 pm by RamblerNash
» Iraqi Dinar (IQD)
Sat Sep 07, 2024 7:24 pm by RamblerNash
» The Iraqi Dinar Revaluation Scam: False Hope, Financial Deception
Sat Sep 07, 2024 7:13 pm by RamblerNash
» Yes, the Iraqi Dinar is a SCAM: Responding to Marcus Williams' Comments on my Investment Scam Video
Sat Aug 24, 2024 11:12 pm by RamblerNash
» AMERICA’S COLOR REVOLUTION — Brought To You By The U.S. Intelligence Community & Coming To A City Near You
Mon Jun 17, 2024 5:58 am by kenlej
» Go Russia
Mon Jun 17, 2024 5:49 am by kenlej
» I am too pretty for math, but....
Wed Jun 12, 2024 6:56 pm by Mission1st
» Interesting article
Wed Jun 12, 2024 6:34 pm by Mission1st
» Phony Tony: New Platform, same old song and dance
Wed Jun 12, 2024 6:32 pm by Mission1st
» The Craziness of Scam by "Tony TNT Renfrow" and the Iraqi Dinar Currency Scam
Tue Jun 11, 2024 12:26 pm by Mission1st
» Even conspiratorial currency speculators aren’t buying a Russian ruble revalue - It’s not the next the Iraqi dinar
Mon Jun 10, 2024 1:04 pm by RamblerNash
» The Fundamentals of Finance and Pimpy Live
Fri Jun 07, 2024 5:02 pm by Dorotnas
» Carnival Rides
Fri May 10, 2024 5:03 pm by kenlej
» Go Russia
Sun May 05, 2024 10:51 am by kenlej
» Textbook Tony
Mon Apr 29, 2024 4:13 pm by Mission1st
» The Rockefellers and the controllers are freaking out right about now
Fri Apr 26, 2024 11:16 am by kenlej
» Phony Tony sez: Full Steam Ahead!
Sat Apr 13, 2024 11:51 am by Mission1st
» Dave Schmidt - Zim Notes for Purchase (NOT PHYSICAL NOTES)
Sat Apr 13, 2024 11:45 am by Mission1st
» Russia aren't taking any prisoners
Fri Apr 05, 2024 6:48 pm by kenlej
» Deadly stampede could affect Iraq’s World Cup hopes 1/19/23
Wed Mar 27, 2024 6:02 am by Ditartyn